Main Modifications Consultation

Ends on 7th September 2026 (28 days remaining)

Chapter 6. Housing

MM25 Comment

Page 82

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1

Proposed Modification

Amend policy text to read:

Policy H1 – Sites proposed for residential development

Provision is made in this Local Plan for the delivery of at least 123 homes per annum with an additional 10% allowance for flexibility. The Plan therefore makes provision for 2705 new dwellings distributed in accordance with the spatial strategy in Policy SS1.

The Local Plan meets the minimum housing requirement of 123 dwellings per annum (totalling 2,460 dwellings over the plan period), as set out in bullet 1 of Policy SS1 and derived from the Government’s Standard Method. The Council is seeking to make provision for approximately 10% more than this requirement, resulting in a planned housing supply of 2,705 dwellings. This planned supply is intended to provide flexibility, support delivery and ensure the minimum requirement is met, and is distributed in accordance with the spatial strategy in Policy SS1.

Amend Table to read:

Location

Minimum requirement Distribution of housing provision (including 10% buffer)

Completions and commitments since 31/03/2021

Residual requirement

Delivery Mechanism

Oakham with Barleythorpe

820

729746

9174

Local Plan

Uppingham

515*

2014

3141

Neighbourhood Plan

Stamford North

650

0

650**

Local Plan/Planning Application

Larger Villages

620

502677

118-57

Local Plan

Small villages

100

84

16

Local Plan

County total

2705

1516711

1189995

*This is a minimum requirement rather than a supply figure.

Insert footnote next to the 650 at Stamford North in the table to read

** It is intended that any development on the Rutland part of a comprehensive Sustainable Urban Extension to Stamford should count towards Rutland's housing needs and so reduce the requirement for new housing elsewhere in Rutland. It should also be noted that the Housing Trajectory based on a base date of 1st April 2025 shows that only 583 dwellings are to be delivery in the plan period. This also applies to the table in Policy H1.

.....

Uppingham Total: 3141 dwellings

To be allocated through the Uppingham Neighbourhood Plan. This figure

is a requirement and not the total supply of dwellings provided for via the

the Neighbourhood Plan.

Reason

For clarity and to be clear that the figures in the table relate provision/supply and that the figure for Uppingham is a requirement and supply.

MM26 Comment

Page 82

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1 – Paragraph 6.5

Proposed Modification

Amend paragraph to read:

The proposed supply of housingdistribution of housing provision for this Local Plan is set out belowin Policy H1, including a 10% buffer. It is proposed to apply a contingency buffer of 10% to ensure delivery of the minimum housing requirement. This will also provides for a level of market choice, to support delivery.

Reason

For consistency related to other modifications to Policy H1

MM27 Comment

Page 82

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1 – Table 3

Proposed Modification

Delete Table 3

Table 3 – Housing Requirement

Requirement 2021-41 (123* dpa + 10% buffer)

Proposed target spatial distribution

Commitments at 31st March 2023*

Completions from April 2021 to March 2023*

Minimum indicative target housing supply to deliver the requirement

Stamford North**

650 leaving 2,056

650

Oakham

820

524

205

91

Uppingham

515

189

12

314

Larger Village with PLD

620

445

78

97

Small villages/hamlets (without a PLD)

100

55

8

Indicative provision of an additional 37- dwellings assumed to be delivered through infill/windfall in these villages without proposing allocations in these settlements

County Total

2706

2705

1213

303

1189

* These figures will be reviewed and updated on a regular basis during the preparation of

the Local Plan.

** It is intended now that any development on the Rutland part of a comprehensive

Sustainable Urban Extension to Stamford should count towards Rutland’s housing needs

and so reduce the requirement for new housing elsewhere in Rutland.

Reason

To prevent duplication with the table in Policy H1

MM28 Comment

Page 82

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1

Proposed Modification

Amend text at paragraph 6.7 and add two new paragraphs to read:

The NPPF states that the overall strategic housing requirement policy in the Local Plan should set out a housing requirement for designated neighbourhood plan areas which reflects the overall strategy for the pattern and scale of development and any relevant allocations. Therefore, this Local Plan establishes the strategy for the pattern and scale of development (in Policy SD2) and has allocated suitable and deliverable sites in settlements across the County (excluding Uppingham) and the proposed allocations included in this Plan are considered to meet that requirement. For Uppingham, the figure of 515 dwellings forms part of the spatial distribution of development under Policy SS1 and does not constitute a separate housing requirement for the Neighbourhood Plan area.

The housing requirement of 515 dwellings for Uppingham is derived from the spatial distribution of the Local Plan housing requirement and forms the starting point for assessing housing delivery in the town over the plan period. The figure of 314 dwellings represents the residual housing requirement, calculated by deducting dwellings that have been completed or are committed in Uppingham since the start of the plan period from the overall requirement of 515 dwellings. In accordance with national policy and the spatial strategy of the emerging Local Plan, this residual requirement is intended to be met through policies and site allocations in the Uppingham Neighbourhood Plan.

The Neighbourhood Plan has been prepared in alignment with the Local Plan and provides the mechanism by which the residual requirement arising from the 515dwelling minimum is delivered, through the identification of sufficient housing supply in appropriate and sustainable locations within the town. Housing delivered through the Neighbourhood Plan contributes to the overall housing supply for Rutland and is reflected in the countywide housing land supply position, which is monitored and reported annually in accordance with national policy, as set out in the Housing Land Supply section below. The housing supply identified for Uppingham is therefore assessed against the residual housing requirement.

Reason

To clarify that the figure for Uppingham in H1 is a requirement not supply.

MM29 Comment

Page 82

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1

Proposed Modification

Amend text at paragraph 6.14 and add two new tables and new supporting text to read:

Development principles to guide the form, layout, dwelling mix (for housing allocations), and infrastructure needs of each allocated site are set out in H1.1 – H1.4below and in policy H2.

Housing Land Supply

The housing supply position will be monitored annually, in order to ensure that a deliverable five-year supply of housing sites with an additional buffer is maintained in Rutland. An annual report will be published every year to set out the Council’s position against the (adopted) housing requirement for the County which identifies the deliverable supply to establish the number of years which are available.

Paragraph 77 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF 12/23) includes a requirement for local planning authorities to identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide five years’ worth of housing land when assessed against their housing requirements.

As the Rutland Local Plan was submitted for examination under the transitional arrangements set out in NPPF 12/24, the standard method for calculating Local Housing Need (LHN) provides a minimum housing requirement for Rutland of 123 dwelling per annum, which equates to a five-year local need figure of 615 dwellings. Based on the most recent Housing Delivery Test in 2023, Rutland has gone below the delivery requirement of at least 85%, at 80% over the past three years and therefore the 20% buffer for persistent under delivery does now apply.

The table below demonstrates the Council has a five-year housing land supply for the five-year period from the adoption date of the Local Plan (at end 24/25), for the period 2026/27 to 2030/31.

Furthermore, the Local Plan identifies a total supply of 3,150 for the plan period, it is recognised that this higher than the planned housing provision of 2,705 set out in Policy H1. Providing this additional supply allows the Council to provide flexibility and resilience to ensure the minimum requirement can be met. Table 3 below shows how the supply of 3,150 is forecast to be delivered during the plan period, up to 2041.

Insert new table:

Table 3 – Housing Land Supply Calculation

A table showing Rutland's five-year supply based on the local housing need.

Spatial Distribution of Housing Land Supply

The table below compares the planned spatial distribution of housing set out in Policy H1 with the expected distribution of housing supply over the plan period 2021–2041, based on the housing trajectory. It provides a clear illustration of how the spatial strategy will be delivered in practice.

Insert new table:

Table 4 – Spatial distribution of Housing Land Supply

Proposed target spatial distribution

Total supply 2021-2041

Stamford North

650

583

Oakham

820

832

Uppingham

515

643

Larger Village with PLD

620

701

Small villages/ hamlets (without a PLD)

100

81

Total supply exc. Windfall/Lapse Rate

2705

2840

Windfall

325

Lapse rate

-20

Total supply

3145

The comparison shows that, while overall housing delivery will exceed the minimum requirement and planned provision, the distribution of development does not align exactly with the proportions set out in Policy H1. In particular, a greater proportion of development is expected to come forward in Uppingham and the Larger Villages, while delivery at Stamford North is lower within the plan period. As a strategic site, the latter is anticipated to continue beyond the end of the plan period, and therefore a proportion of delivery falls outside the 2021–2041 plan-period.

These differences are expected and reflect the way housing supply comes forward over time. A significant proportion of the identified supply arises from existing commitments, including sites with planning permission granted prior to adoption of the Plan. These contribute to delivery irrespective of the spatial distribution targets. In addition, the housing trajectory includes an allowance for windfall development, which is not site-specific but is expected to come forward in sustainable locations across the County in accordance with the policies of the Plan.

Overall, the evidence demonstrates that the spatial strategy is operating effectively, with all parts of the settlement hierarchy contributing to housing delivery and sufficient flexibility to ensure that the overall housing requirement is met and exceeded over the plan period.

Table 5 Sources of Housing Supply for the Plan Period 2021-2041

Past Completions

Estimated

Completions

Years 1- 5 (post adoption)

Years 6-10 (post adoption)

Years 11 - 15 (post adoption)

Total (2021/ 22 -

2040/

41)

2021/

22

2022/

23

2023/

24

2024/

25

2025/26

2026/

27

2027/

28

2028/

29

2029/

30

2030/

31

2031/

32

2032/

33

2033/

34

2034/

35

2035/

36

2036/

37

2037/

38

2038/

39

2039/

40

2040/

41

Completions (21/22 -

24/25)

96

97

110

140

443

Estimated completions for

25/26

See sources of

supply below

*

Large sites with Planning

Permission

130

144

112

124

131

106

104

78

33

15

0

0

0

0

0

0

982

Small sites with Planning

Permission

55

105

4

0

0

0

164

Proposed Local Plan

Allocations

0

0

0

40

89

78

11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

218

Stamford North

0

0

0

0

33

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

583

Neighbourhood Plan

Allocations

0

0

0

0

33

99

83

73

98

60

9

0

0

0

0

0

455

Windfall allowance

0

0

0

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

325

Lapse rate

0

-10

-10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-20

Annual Housing

Requirement

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

123

2460

Total Housing Land Supply

96

97

110

140

185

239

106

189

311

358

273

226

206

150

84

75

75

75

75

75

3145

Total (per period)

443

185

1203

939

375

Housing Trajectory

Figure 4 - Rutland Housing Trajectory

A bar chart showing Rutland's housing trajectory from 2021/22 to 2040/41 in termsof completiotns, plan allocations, planning permission and windfall allowance.

Reason

To set out the Council’s latest position on housing land supply, confirm removal of FOA’s from the trajectory and provide distribution of supply against the proposed spatial strategy.

MM30 Comment

Page 85

Para/Table/Box/Policy

Paragraph 6.9

Proposed Modification

Amend paragraph to read:

Neighbourhood plans can, however, make provision for more housing development than that required in the strategic policy and the Council supports groups that wish to provide site allocations for housing development within their neighbourhood plans that go beyond the minimum requirement contained in the strategic policy, particularly those who assess their local housing needs through an appropriate assessment and plan to meet it. As a general guide, additional housing development should not exceed 5% of the number of existing dwellings in the neighbourhood plan area or be no more than 20% greater than the minimum requirement already allocated in this Local Plan.

Reason

Soundness and effectiveness

MM31 Comment

Page 86

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1.1

Proposed Modification

Amend policy text to read:

H1.1 Land south of Stamford Road

Policy H.1

Land at Stamford Road

Opus ID: 156

Indicative capacity 94

Minimum 30% affordable housing

‘29 affordable homes / 65 market homes’

‘The proposed development should be designed to incorporate the following key principles within the layout:’

  1. Retain and enhance all Where possible retain and safeguard trees within the site and boundary hedgerows to contribute to the wider network of green corridors. Any loss shall be compensated for by new supplemental planting;
  2. Ensure the design respects the form and character of the town in this location, as an extension along Stamford Road, and which considers potential effects on the setting of the adjacent Conservation Area;
  3. Ensure the layout and detailed design landscape mitigation measures alongside Stamford Road seek to enhances the settlement edge and conserve the wider ‘setting’ of the Conservation Area and preserves the distinct openness along Stamford Road
  4. Ensure the layout takes account of the Cordon Sanitaire in the north-east corner of the site;
  5. Ensure appropriate access solution to avoid conflict with Sculthorpe Close opposite  and the junction of A6003 with A606 and that highway mitigations measures are provided;
  6. Provide safe, direct and convenient footway and cycleway connections through the site and to the town centre. This iswilllikely to include a Local Transport Note 1/20 (LTN 1/20) compliant3m wide shared footway/cycleway facility along the Stamford Road site frontage, plus supporting public transport improvements as a minimumappropriate;
  7. Make appropriate provision for surface water management systems, including SUDS drainage system to ensure greenfield run off rates are maintained once the site is developed;
  8. Provide an appropriate mix of housing choices which reflect is informed by the mix set out in the most up to date SHMA and site-specific circumstances.including 30% of the site capacity as affordable homes (a target of 24 homes)
  9. Ensure 2% of site capacity to be provided as serviced self-build/custom build plots
  10. Provide green infrastructure and landscaping incorporating an appropriate amount open space, for each relevant typology using the standards in Appendix 3; and this should include “a LAP and a LEAP to meet the need for children’s play
  11. Submission of a Health Impact Assessment to identify and respond to the impacts of development on health and well being.

Reason

For clarity and consistency across allocation policies

  • Ensure wording consistency across all site allocation policies
  • Remove specific housing mix - to be informed by SHMA
  • Respond directly to comment relating to the Conservation Area
  • Remove the requirement for the cordon sanitaire to be taken into account
  • Provide greater clarity relating to the footway and cycleway connections
  • Remove requirement to provide LAP and LEAP play areas.

MM32 Comment

Page 87

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1.2

Proposed Modification

Amend policy text to read:

H1.2 Officer Mess, Edith Weston

Policy H1.2

Land at Officer’s Mess, Edith Weston

Opus ID: 2851

Indicative capacity 85

Minimum 30% affordable housing

‘26 affordable homes / 59 market homes’

‘The proposed development should be designed to incorporate the following key principles within the layout:’

  1. Retain the line of mature trees along the northern boundary of the site along Manton Road;
  2. Ensure the design and layout respects the form and character of the village in this location and enhances the settlement edge and the wider ‘setting’ of the Conservation Area;
  3. Provide an appropriate mix of housing choices which is informed by reflect the mix set out in the most up to date SHMA and site-specific circumstancesincluding 30% of the site capacity as affordable homes (a target of 26 homes)
  4. Ensure 2% of site capacity to be provided as serviced self-build/custom build plots
  5. Make appropriate provision for surface water management systems, including a SUDS drainage system to ensure greenfield run off rates are maintained once the site is developed;
  6. Provide green infrastructure and landscaping incorporating an appropriate amount open space, for each relevant typology using the standards in Appendix 3., this should include “a LAP and a LEAP to meet the need for children’s play’
  7. Open space provision should be on-site in the southwest corner along with provision of surface water retention basin as part of drainage proposals;
  8. Provide safe, direct and convenient footway and cycleway connections through the site and to the village centre; and
  9. Submission of a Health Impact Assessment to identify and respond to the impacts of development on health and well being.
  10. Ensure the design and layout respects the form and character of the village in this location and enhances the settlement edge and the wider 'setting' of the Conservation Area.’

For Information:

An application for this site should be accompanied by the following evidence/surveys which include, where appropriate, evidence that the necessary mitigation measures have been planned into the design and layout of the development:

  • Detailed Design Code.
  • Archaeological Programme of Works required
  • Contaminated Land Investigation
  • Noise Impact Assessment
  • Construction Method Statement
  • Removal of redundant current highway features
  • Health Impact Assessment
  • Bat Mitigation Method Statement
  • Construction Environment Management Plan
  • Detailed Design of off-site highway works
  • Heritage Impact Assessment

Reason

For clarity and consistency across allocation policies.

  • Ensure wording consistency across all site allocation policies.
  • Remove specific housing mix - to be informed by SHMA
  • Remove requirement to provide LAP and LEAP play areas
  • Provide an additional criteria relating design and layout in the context of the Conservation Area
  • Add the requirement for a Heritage Impact Assessment

MM33 Comment

Page 88

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1.3

Proposed Modification

Amend policy text to read:

H1.3 Whitwell Road South, Empingham

Policy H1.3

Land South of Whitwell Road, Empingham

Opus ID: 82

Indicative capacity 28

Minimum 30% affordable housing

9 affordable homes / 19 market homes

‘The proposed development should be designed to incorporate the following key principles:within the layout:’

  1. Provision of a new medical centre and associated car parking in accordance with policy INF4;
  2. Retain the tree belt on the southern boundary to screen any potential development and retain and protect the trees on the north side of the site;
  3. Provide swift boxes as the site is within a Swift Alert area;
  4. Ensure the development is in keeping with the settlement form and pattern that retains the characteristic compact, regular linear pattern of the village;
  5. Retain the views out from the settlement to undeveloped ridges of higher ground on the skyline including the church as a focal point which create an important backdrop to the village ;
  6. Ensure mitigation of any potential impact of the development on nearby heritage assets and their setting;
  7. Provide safe, direct and convenient footway and cycleway connections through the site, to the medical centre and to the village centre and willare likely to include a Local Transport Note 1/20 (LTN 1/20) compliant 2m wide footway from the site to connect to the existing footway infrastructure to the north with a suitable crossing point for the bus stop as a minimum;’
  1.  Provide an appropriate mix of housing choices which reflect is informed by the mix set out in the most up to date SHMA and site-specific circumstances.including 30% of the site capacity as affordable homes (a target of 9 homes)’
  2. Provide green infrastructure and landscaping incorporating an appropriate amount open space, for each relevant typology using the standards in Appendix 3, this should include “a LAP and a LEAP to meet the need for children’s play
  3.  Ensure the design and layout respects the form and character of the village in this location and enhances the settlement and the wider 'setting' of the Conservation Area.’
  4. Submission of a Health Impact Assessment to identify and respond to the impacts of development on health and well-being.’
  5. Ensure any development on the site does not impact on the Mineral Safeguarding Area,in accordance with Policy MIN3

For Information:

An application for this site should be accompanied by the following evidence/surveys which include, where appropriate, evidence that the necessary mitigation measures have been planned into the design and layout of the development:

  • Badger Survey
  • Habitat survey
  • Archaeological Pre-determination evaluation by desk based and appropriate field assessment
  • Agricultural Land Survey (if there is not enough information available from previous data)
  • Mineral Resource Assessment (MRA) due to the site being location within a Minerals Safeguarding Area (MSA).

Reason

For clarity and consistency across allocation policies.

  • Ensure wording consistency across all site allocation policies
  • Remove specific housing mix - to be informed by SHMA
  • Provide greater clarity relating to the footway and cycleway connections
  • Remove requirement to provide LAP and LEAP play areas
  • Provide an additional criteria relating design and layout in the context of the Conservation Area
  • Add the requirement for a Heritage Impact Assessment
  • Ensure reference is made to relevant mineral policy and associated requirement for a Minerals Resource Assessment 

MM34 Comment

Page 89

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H1.4

Proposed Modification

Amend policy text to read:

H1.4 Land South West of Belmesthorpe Lane, Ryhall

Policy H1.4

Land South West of Belmesthorpe Lane, Ryhall

Opus ID: 34

Indicative capacity 11

Minimum 30% affordable housing

4 affordable homes / 7 market homes

....

The proposed development should be designed to incorporate the following key principles within the layout:

...

  1. Retain and enhance all trees within the site and boundary hedgerows to contribute to the wider network of green corridors;
  2. Provision of a 10m wide ecological buffer strip adjacent the River Gwash, to form a wildlife corridor/green area;
  3. Make appropriate provision for surface water management systems, including a SUDS drainage system to ensure greenfield run off rates are maintained once the site is developed;
  4. Provide an appropriate mix of housing choices which reflect is informed by the mix set out in the most up to date SHMA and site-specific circumstances.including 30% of the site capacity as affordable homes (a target of 4 homes)
  5. Provide safe, direct and convenient footway and cycleway connections through the site along Belmesthorpe Lane and to the village centre;
  6. Ensure an appropriate access solution and highway mitigation measure are provided including a scheme of off-site highways improvements;
  7. Provide green infrastructure and landscaping incorporating an appropriate amount open space, for each relevant typology using the standards in Appendix 3, this should include “a LAP and a LEAP to meet the need for children’s play
  8. Ensure the layout and detailed design including landscape mitigation measures enhances the key views towards the site along Belmesthorpe Lane and terminating the view from both Back Lane and The Crescent and takes account of positive characteristics of the settlement generally and Belmesthorpe Lane specifically.
  9. Ensure the design and layout reflects and considers the potential effects on the setting and character of the adjacent Conservation Area
  10. Submission of a Health Impact Assessment to identify and respond to the impacts of development on health and well-being
  11. Ensure any development on the site does not impact on the Mineral Safeguarding Area, in accordance with Policy MIN3

For Information:

An application for this site should be accompanied by the following evidence/surveys which include, where appropriate, evidence that the necessary mitigation measures have been planned into the design and layout of the development:

  • A thorough site and contextual analysis
  • Landscape Ecological Management Plan
  • Construction Environment Management Plan for biodiversity
  • SUDs Drainage System
  • Detailed Design of off-site highway works 
  • Pre-condition Highway Survey
  • Archaeological Assessment.
  • Mineral Resource Assessment (MRA) due to the site being location within a Minerals Safeguarding Area (MSA).

Reason

For clarity and consistency across allocation policies.

  • Ensure wording consistency across all site allocation policies
  • Remove specific housing mix - to be informed by SHMA:
  • Remove requirement to provide LAP and LEAP play areas.
  • Add criterion which seeks to conserve and enhance the character and setting of Conservation Areas
  • Insert requirement to provide Health Impact Assessment
  • Insert requirement to provide Archaeological Assessment.
  • Add additional criteria to refer to Mineral Safeguarding Area and Policy MIN3 and associated requirement for a Mineral Resource Assessment

MM35 Comment

Page 91

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H2

Proposed Modification

Amend policy text to read:

  1.  a distributor road facilitating the connection of the Old Great North Road, Little Casterton Road and Ryhall Roadand any associated junction improvements arising from this new road, including increasing capacity at the A1/A606 junctionappropriate mitigation measures to the Strategic Road Network, to be agreed with Highways England.'

  1. Foul drainage connection via the 1050mm foul sewer in Uffington Road, via a pumping station, or any other arrangement which has been agreed in writing by the LPA in consultation with Anglian Water. A foul drainage pre-commencement planning condition will be necessary to ensure the sewer network upgrades are in place and sewer flooding is avoided;
  2. an appropriate buffer for the protection and enhancement of the setting of the Roman Town Scheduled Monument at Great Casterton, the area of this buffer should be determined through a Heritage Impact Assessment and masterplan which addresses the significance of the monument and associated remains;

Reason

For consistency with Statement of Common Ground with Historic England

  • Insert text into policy H2 relating to the buffer zone at Gt. Casterton as per final Statement of Common Ground with Historic England
  • Delete reference to the A1/A606 scheme in criterion d and base requirements on further Transport Assessment work and add to criterion j) to allow flexibility for alternative foul drainage solutions to be agreed by the local authority (MM51)
  • Add criterion relating to Mineral Safeguarding Areas consistent with other modifications to other allocation policies

MM36 Comment

Page 96

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H4

Proposed Modification

Amend Policy text to read:

Development proposals for sites of 10 or more dwellings shouldwhere feasible provide a range of house types, sizes, and tenures to meet the general and specialist needs for housing in Rutland in line with Table 4 below, as identified in the latest Housing Market Assessment or other up-to-date evidence of local housing need.

Reason

Soundness and effectiveness

MM37 Comment

Page 99

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H5

Proposed Modification

Amend Policy text to read:

Where practicable, new dwellings should also be provided with convenient external access, parking and storage facilities for mobility scooters.

On sites totalling 50 or more dwellings, a minimum of 2% of all dwellings is required to meet part M4(3) of the Building Regulations. Where practicable, these new dwellings should also be provided with convenient external access, parking and storage facilities for mobility scooters.

Reason

Soundness and effectiveness

MM38 Comment

Page 104

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H7

Proposed Modification

Amend sixth paragraph of policy text to read:

…….consideration may be given to this at the planning application stage. This may particularly be the case with extra care housing. The Council will follow national guidance…

Reason

Clarity and effectiveness

MM39 Comment

Page 105,106,107

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H7(b), 6.59

Proposed Modification

Amend Policy text to read:

  1. include at least two-thirds of affordable housing which will normally be affordable housing for rent and the remainder will be affordable home ownership, both within the definition in Annex 2 of the NPPF, and which shall apply to all affordable housing delivered under this policy with the exception of First Homes Exception Sites where a more flexible approach can be taken through Policy H9 (First Homes Exception Sites);
  2. ensure that where major development is proposed the remainder of the affordable housing is through Shared Ownership and/or Discounted Market Sales Housing such as First Homes, as part of the overall affordable housing provision, at least 10% of the total number of homes to be available for affordable home ownership , unless a contrary approach is justified by the relevant paragraph of the NPPF;
  3. achieve a minimum of 25% of all affordable homes secured through developer contributions as First Homes (with the exception of Oakham and Barleythorpe whilst they are covered by their Neighbourhood Development Plan which was 'made' on 24 June 2022), unless a contrary approach is justified by the relevant paragraph of the NPPF;

Amend supporting text at paragraph 6.59 to read:

Under Policy H7, one-third of affordable housing will normally be affordable home ownership and the remaining two-thirds will be affordable housing for rent, both within the definition in Annex 2 of the NPPF. Policy H7 allows two over-lapping requirements in national planning policy to be met. Under paragraph 66 of the NPPF, 10% of the total homes on a major housing development (sites of 10 or more homes or of 0.5 hectares or more) should normally be available for affordable home ownership. Under the Written Ministerial Statement on First Homes, at least 25% of the affordable homes secured through developer contributions on a site should normally be First Homes.

Reason

Soundness, effectiveness and to provide clarity on the tenure mix.

MM40 Comment

Page 109

Para/Table/Box/Policy

H8

Proposed Modification

Amend policy text to read:

  1. Small sites for affordable housing (which meets the NPPF definition of affordable housing) may be permitted within, or immediately adjacent to, the Planned Limits of Development of a Larger Village as defined in Policy SS1 or adjacent to existing built form of a Smaller Village and Hamletsas an exception to normal policies of restraint provided that they:

Reason

Soundness

MM41 Comment

Page 114,115,116

Para/Table/Box/Policy

Policy H10

Proposed Modification

Amend para 6.78 to read:

Government Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (2015) Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (2023) (PPTS) states...

Amend policy text to read:

The Council will seek to meet the need identified in the latest Gypsy, Traveller, and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation Assessment (GTTSAA) for the period 2021-2041:

  • 16 27 pitches for Gypsies and Travellers
  •  33 34 plots for Travelling Show people (of which there is already a consent granted for 7 plots)

(Remainder of policy text deleted)

Amend supporting text to read:

Why is this policy needed?

The Council has published (in 2023) a new assessment of the accommodationneeds of Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople (GTTSAA) in its area. There are families within the study area who would like to increase the number of pitches and plots and/or number of caravans allowed per pitch or plot on existing site/yards and consider that the expansion of sites with adequate space would contribute towards meeting existing need. The report concluded that there is an overall need shortfall in Rutland over the next 20 years of some 1627 residential pitches for Gypsies and Travellers and 33 34 plots for Travelling Showpeople. The need for 3334 plots does not take account of 7 additional plots allowed in 2024 as an extension to an existing site to meet their need.

The table below shows the five year need and supply for 2026-31. This has been added to the need for 2021-26, apart from the need met by the 7 Travelling Showpeople plots which has been met by an existing consent. There is 1.59 years supply for Gypsies and Travellers and 5 years for Travelling Showpeople. The Council makes allowance for windfalls under Policy H11.

GTTSAA Need

Gypsies and Travellers

Travelling Show-people

Need

A

2021-26 from survey

19

24

B

Above reduced by need already met

0

7

C

2026-31 from survey

3

3

D

Five year need 2026-31

22

20

a – b + c

Supply

E

Areas 1 & 2 (H10.2 & H10.3)

0

20

F

H10.1, coming forward dependent on need

7

0

G

Total supply

7

20

e+f

H

Remaining forecast unmet need 2026-31

15

0

d - g

I

Number of years’ supply

1.59

5

(g/d) x 5

The table below shows indicative need and supply for 2021- 41, not including windfalls. It assumes Area 3 of the Five Counties extensions is developed last out of Areas 1 to 3. It shows a total of 27 pitches and 34 plots as being needed over the periods 2021 to 2041, with an identified supply of 7 pitches and 35 plots over the same period. Unmet needs will be dealt with via windfalls through Policy H11.

Gypsies and Travellers (including New Travellers)

[annualised]

Travelling Showpeople

[annualised]

Need 2021-26

19 [3.80]

24 [4.80]

Need 2026-31

3 [0.60]

3 [0.60]

Need 2031-36

4 [0.80]

3 [0.60]

Need 2036-41

1 [0.20]

4 [0.80]

Total plan period need (2021-41)

27 [1.35]

34 [1.70]

Less Supply from 2021-31

Five Counties Extension (ref. 2023/1250/FUL)

0 [0]

7 [0.70]

From Areas 1,2 & 3 (H10.2 to H10.4)

0 [0]

20 [2.00]

Densification / Expansion at the Paddocks, Langham

7 [0.70]

0 [0]

Less Supply from 2031-41

From Areas 1,2 & 3 (H10.2 to H10.4)

0 [0]

8 [0.80]

Total plan period supply 2021-41

7 [0.35]

35 [1.75]

Shortfall 2021-41

20 [1.00]

-1 (surplus)

[-0.05]

(Delete remainder of policy text from 6.82 to 6.85)

Reason

Effectiveness, soundness and clarity

The Regulation 19 Local Plan version of Policy H10 has been moved, revised, expanded, restructured and sub-divided into three Main Modifications:

H10 as the strategy policy (updated need/supply)

H10.1–H10.4 (allocation policies for Gypsies & Travellers and Travelling Showpeople with criteria)

H11 (separate windfall policy).

The proposed text is shown for each Main Modification.

Add tabulated 5 year and plan period pitch and plot requirements and supply for effectiveness, soundness and clarity.

Targets updated to take account of the revised definition of Gypsies and Travellers and Travelling Show people in Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS) December 2023 for soundness,effectiveness and strategy.

Remove references to Future Opportunity Areas for effectiveness, soundness and clarity.

MM42 Comment

Page 114-116

Para/Table/Box/Policy

Policy H10.1 to H10.4

Proposed Modification

Add new Policy to read:

Policy H10.1 to H10.4 Development principles for Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople allocations

Specific allocations to meet the identified need are proposed below and shown on the Policies Map. The sites allocated at The Paddocks, Langham and Five Counties, Greetham are extensions to existing authorised Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople sites and have been identified to meet locallyarising needs from existing households.

Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation:

H10.1 The Paddocks site at Langham

  • The Paddocks South Extension
  • The Paddocks intensification within existing site boundaries

Travelling Showpeople Accommodation:

Five Counties extension, Greetham

  • H10.2 Area 1 Five Counties Extension
  • H10.3 Area 2 Five Counties Extension
  • H10.4 Area 3 Five Counties Extension

Additional provision will be delivered through safeguarding authorised sites (including potential extensions) and policy compliant extensions to existing sites.

Policies H10.1 – H10.4 set out detailed development principles which should be incorporated into the development proposal for each site. Development principles are set out to guide the form, layout and infrastructure needs for both the Gypsy and Traveller allocation at the Paddocks, Langham (H10.1) and the Travelling Showpeople allocations at the Five Counties Extension, Greetham (H10.2 to H10.4). They also include a list of additional studies and evidence which will be required to support a planning application for each site. This list is not exhaustive, and additional work may be requested as part of the planning application process. The development principles at sites H10.1 to H10.4 are site specific and should be read alongside the general development principles at H11.

H10.1 The Paddocks site at Langham

Policy H10.1

The Paddocks at Langham

OPUS ID: 8746

3 additional pitches to be provided through extension at The Paddocks South (0.39 ha) and 4 additional pitches through intensification within the existing site boundaries at the Paddocks.

The proposed development should be designed to incorporate the following key principles:

  1. Have Highways access either from a new access off the A606, or demonstrate how it can be achieved through the existing site
  2. Address the needs of ecology, including any Great Crested Newts from nearby pond(s)
  3. Address the visitor caravan parking already permitted on the Paddocks South, which has been allowed for when setting the target of three pitches
  4. Take account of LLFA advice regarding surface water
  5. Ensure lighting, noise, traffic and activity do not generate unacceptable adverse impact on the health and living conditions of the residents of the site.

For information;

An application for this site should be accompanied by the following evidence/surveys which include, where appropriate, evidence that the necessary mitigation measures have been planned into the design and layout of the development

  • Demonstrate an achievable access either from the A606 directly, or through the existing site whilst demonstrating how this can be achieved
  • Great Crested Newt survey and any other relevant ecological surveys
  • An internal access design which maintains the capacity of the visitor caravan parking currently permitted
  • Make appropriate provision for surface water management systems, including a SUDS drainage system to ensure run off rates are maintained once the site is developed
  • Any relevant environmental assessment(s) related to pollution or noise.

H10.2 to H10.4 Five Counties Extension

At Five Counties, Greetham, consent has already been granted for Five Counties Extension (ref. 2023/1250/FUL) for 7 plots, which is allowed for in the tables above for supply in 2021-26. This is separate from the allocation sites and is located to the immediate east of Area 1 (H10.2).

Provision is made for up to 28 plots to be safeguarded and allocated for Travelling Showpeople for the plan period, consisting of Areas (1), (2) and (3) to be phased to best meet need, with Areas 1 and 2 developed first. For modelling purposes in the tables above it is assumed that Areas 1 and 2 will be developed prior to 2031 (covering the period of need for 2026-31) and Area 3 not developed prior to 2031 (covering the periods of need for 2031-36 and 2036-41). However, 2031 should not be viewed as a rigid timescale, with the allocated sites expected to be developed according to identified need as assessed by the GTTSAA, with Area 3 covering identified need at some point from 2031 onwards. In the event that Area 2 does not come forward in a timely way but Area 1 does, Area 3 may be brought forward before Area 2 if the need is sufficient.

Policy H10.2 to H10.4

Five Counties Extension, Greetham

OPUS ID: 8040 (Area 1), 8041 (Area 2), 8042 (Area 3).

H10.2 Area 1 Five Counties Extension (0.96ha, 6 plots)

H10.3 Area 2 Five Counties Extension (1.95ha, 14 plots)

H10.4 Area 3 Five Counties Extension (1.19ha, 8 plots)

The proposed development should be designed to incorporate the following key principles:

  1. Ensure that the Groundwater Source Protection Zone 2/3 is protected from potential contamination as a result of development
  2. Ensure that access into and within the yard is suitable for heavy goods vehicles
  3. Ensure that access is available but is not taken directly from the A1 or the B668
  4. Ensure that ecology including trees and hedgerows is protected from harm and/or harm is successfully mitigated.
  5. Ensure lighting, noise, traffic and activity do not generate unacceptable adverse impact on the health and living conditions of the residents of the site.

For information:

An application for this yard should be accompanied by the following evidence/surveys which include, where appropriate, evidence that the necessary mitigation measures have been planned into the design and layout of the development:

  • Mitigation of the Groundwater Source Protection Zone risk
  • Appropriate access to – and within – the yard
  • Relevant ecological surveys (including proximity to woodland for H10.2 and H10.4)
  • Any relevant environmental assessment(s) related to pollution or noise
  • Archaeology assessment (H10.4).

Reason

Effectiveness, soundness and clarity

Amend policies H10.1 to H10.4 to include further detail on allocations and inclusion of development principles and rearrange order of policy and content of supporting text for effectiveness,soundness and clarity.

Amend reference to PPTS to correct version for effectiveness, soundness and clarity.

MM43 Comment

Page 115, 116

Para/Table/Box/Policy

Policy H11

Proposed Modification

Add new policy to read:

Policy H11 – Assessment Criteria for Proposals for Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation

Proposals for sites for Gypsy and Traveller and/or Travelling Showpeople will be supported provided that:

  1. in the case of permanent sites, there is reasonable and convenient access to schools, medical services, shops, and other community facilities;
  2. the site is well located and provides safe and convenient vehicular, pedestrian and cycle access and will not result in a level of traffic generation which is inappropriate for roads in the area;
  3. the impact on heritage assets, landscape character and/or sites/areas of nature conservation value including the internationally designated nature conservation site of Rutland Water is minimised;
  4. the site provides adequate on-site facilities for parking, storage, play and residential amenity (including basic essential services);
  5. the site is not visually intrusive;
  6. adequate levels of privacy and residential amenity for occupiers and adjacent occupiers will be provided;
  7. site shall normally only be occupied by households who meet the planning definition of Gypsies, Travellers or Travelling Showpeople and
  8. no significant barriers to development exist in terms of flooding, poor drainage, poor ground stability or proximity to other hazardous land or installation where other forms of housing would not be suitable.

Add supporting text to read:

Why is this policy needed?

The purpose of Policy H11 is to set out the criteria against which planning applications will be assessed to meet the identified needs of Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople through the allocations at H10.1 to H10.4. The criteria based approach also provides a robust framework to consider any unidentified needs that may come forward and contribute to the supply during the plan period.

The Council has previously adopted a criteria-based policy towards sites for Gypsies and Travellers and this had been successful in ensuring that sufficient sites have come forward to meet the previous need for sites for Gypsies and Travellers that had been identified. The Council works with the Multi-Agency Traveller Unit (MATU) in Leicester to support the travelling communities within the County.

Reason

As a result of the deletion above of the criteria for determining proposals for new sites in H10 a replacement criteria-based policy to be added as H11.

Title of policy and first line up to colon amended for clarity.

Amend criterion g) of Policy H10 to reflect changes to the definition of Travellers in national policy for effectiveness, soundness and clarity.

Reference to Future Opportunity Areas removed for effectiveness and soundness.

Supporting text revised for effectiveness, soundness and clarity.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.
back to top back to top