Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Support

Representation ID: 5709

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

Braunston parish council support the wording of policy EN1 but in practice the policy is not adhered to. Development seems a priority.

Support

Representation ID: 5710

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

Fine words!
If we didn’t destroy nature in the first place there would be no need to replace it!

Support

Representation ID: 5711

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

This must be enforced

Support

Representation ID: 5712

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

Tree replacement should be strictly enforced, it takes many years for replacement trees to mature and gain the amenity value of the lost tree

Support

Representation ID: 5713

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

Braunston parish council supports policy EN5 but questions the wording ‘wholly exceptional circumstances’ this appears to provide an easy way round the policy

Support

Representation ID: 5715

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

Agricultural land is a valuable asset and we all have a duty to protect it. Development should be confined to brown field sites where possible, we have a duty to protect our rural county from over development and we must maintain sufficient land for food production and to maintain the beauty of the county of Rutland.

Support

Representation ID: 5717

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

We support this but it needs to be enforced

Support

Representation ID: 5718

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

.

Support

Representation ID: 5720

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

Support

Support

Representation ID: 5721

Received: 06/01/2024

Respondent: Braunston-in-Rutland Parish Council

Support