Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Object

Representation ID: 6382

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

Summary of MPC e-mail submission of 7/1/24. New classifications do not provide sufficient guidance for planning purposes. Re-classification of Manton from “RV” to Larger Village inappropriate as no school, convenience store, post office, general medical practice. Employment opportunities very limited, bus service timings make it impracticable for many requirements so will result in additional travel and pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 6388

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

Summary of MPC e-mail submission of 7/1/24. Reason for selected changes in PLDs not clear. Some of the changes in the North and North East of the village stretch the PLD into the RWA. PLD in site allocation map differs from the evidence base PLD Review Final Report – October 2023. Whilst we understand the reasons given in the report for the particular sites they are not the only sites to which that could apply and we are not clear of the purpose of making these particular changes.

Object

Representation ID: 6395

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

Summary of MPC e-mail submission of 7/1/24. MPC objects to the proposal to remove PLDs from smaller villages; this is likely to lead to significant development and expansion of these rural villages, encroachment into open countryside and increase in traffic and pollution to the detriment of the character of the County.

Object

Representation ID: 6463

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

The map accessed through the Regulation 18 consultation website for this site is misleading. It appears to show that the site is within the PLD for Manton but in fact the PLD runs South of the site: the report on PLD's in the evidence base shows the existing PLD running south of site H1.11 (ie excluding the site) and does not make any recommendations for change. MPC requests that map within (or accessed by) the Regulation 18 Plan be corrected or the reason for the disparity between the evidence base and the Plan explained.


MPC objects to the inclusion of this site:
1 This is a greenfield site is outside the village PLD shown in the evidence base with no proposal for change.
2 Access to the site is difficult being from narrow rural lanes crossing the Rutland Water Circular track.
3 Development of the site would be detrimental to both the character of the village and the rural character of the Rutland Water multi-use track at this point.
4 Manton is a village with few facilities where sustainable development would not be possible.

Object

Representation ID: 6464

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

We are concerned that adopting a minimum of 25 dph as a rule will cause inappropriate numbers of dwellings in some rural areas.

Object

Representation ID: 7041

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

Should include maximising the proportion of renewable energy used.

Object

Representation ID: 7245

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

Add: but ensure development complements the character of the County.

Object

Representation ID: 7246

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

Support business investment and where possible attract investment which supports higher paid employment. Protect and maximise the use of the opportunities provided by unique assets like Rutland Water.

Object

Representation ID: 7247

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

High quality is more important than low cost

Object

Representation ID: 7248

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manton Parish Council

Public services including Police and Fire Service should be included in essential infrastructure.