Ryhall

Support

Representation ID: 7286

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manor Oak Homes

Agent: Mr Andy Moffat

Ryhall’s inclusion as a Larger Village is supported. The inclusion of “Proposals for housing development on greenfield sites adjoining the Planned Limits of Development of Oakham and Barleythorpe, Uppingham and the Larger Villages will only be released in exceptional circumstances where it is demonstrated that they are needed to maintain a sufficient supply of 4 deliverable and developable land. This will normally be undertaken through a review of the Local Plan” is welcomed.

Object

Representation ID: 7894

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Ryhall Parish Council

SS1 Spatial Strategy for New Development. Ryhall’s comments with regard to proposed PLD

a) RHY1 - To be on Property Boundary
b) RYH2 - Please confirm why this small parcel has been placed within the PLD?
c) RYH3 - Request to be inside the PLD
d) RYH4 - Request to be inside the PLD
e) RYH5 - Request to be outside the PLD
f) RYH6 - Request to be outside the PLD
g) RYH7 - Includes row of Garages? Are these freehold to the local Properties? Land “split” into two areas, garages and spiny to be outside PLD
h) RYH8 - Request to be inside the PLD
i) Also Request Trout Hatchery & Land between Gwash Close and Gwash Meadows to be inside the PLD (see attached)

We offer a general comment on PLD issues … that is not having a PLD for Smaller Villages may have the unintended consequence of encouraging individual development of large ‘prestige’ detached properties which can change the identity of that community. We recommend all smaller villages should have a defined Planned Limit of Development.