Main Modifications Consultation

Support

Representation ID: 8914

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

This is consistent with NPPF requirements to keep plans up to date and provides flexibility for future growth.

Support

Representation ID: 8915

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

No comment

Object

Representation ID: 8917

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Support the principle and welcome the clarification on proportionality. However, requirements should be proportionate to avoid excessive documentation for small schemes which is not necessary.

Support

Representation ID: 8918

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

The noting of national standards is welcomed which is more consistent with national policy and scheme viability.

Object

Representation ID: 8919

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

The requirement for renewable energy generation 'as practically and viably possible' introduces a level of uncertainty. Performance expectations should be clearly defined and requirements should be technically feasible and viable.

Support

Representation ID: 8920

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

No comment

Object

Representation ID: 8921

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

The requirement for water butts are acceptable but mandatory requirements should not duplicate Building Regulations or create unnecessary burdens. As such, supporting evidence should justify the need and effectiveness.

Support

Representation ID: 8922

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

No comment

Support

Representation ID: 8923

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

Management plans should only be required where proportionate to the scale of development. The amendment improves the position.

Support

Representation ID: 8924

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: William Davis Ltd

The modification provides flexibility and reflects changing transport patterns.