Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan

Support

Representation ID: 8391

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

Policy E4 is supported. It is considered to be in accordance with paragraph 88 of the NPPF.

Support

Representation ID: 8393

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

Support the overall policy but suggest an AMENDMENT as follows:

Therefore, we suggest the following addition to Policy E9:

“Where planning permission is sought for the conversion of residential development to holiday accommodation, there will be a presumption in favour of the change of use, subject to potential impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties.”

Support

Representation ID: 8395

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

The Partnership SUPPORTS this approach to Biodiversity Net Gain, whereby there is evidence to justify the higher percentage of BNG requested above the 10% required by the Environment Act 2021. It is however recognised that a site by site approach may be more appropriate than a blanket percentage figure where seeking in excess of the mandatory 10%.

Furthermore, the Partnership COMMENTS that there should be a consideration of reference to whether there is the ability for some sites and parts of the District to accommodate additional levels of BNG, in order to be used to offset other schemes.

Support

Representation ID: 8396

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

The amendments to this policy a welcome and reflect the suggestions of our client at Regulation 18.

Support

Representation ID: 8400

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

The amendment of the policy to reflect our client's previous submissions is welcome.

However, the use of 'Historic Parklands' in the policy should be further clarified. The status of this definition is not explained either in the policy, the supporting text or within the Glossary.

Object

Representation ID: 8401

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Our client wishes to see further justification/clarification about reference to the term 'Historic Parkland which has been added to the Regulation 19 version of the policy. At present, it is unclear to what this refers and therefore what its impact is.

Object

Representation ID: 8403

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Our client OBJECTS to the designation as shown and recommend that the Wild Rutland site is removed from the Rutland Water area boundary.

Support

Representation ID: 8404

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

The Estate SUPPORTS the principle of a policy focused on renewable energy within the emerging local plan. It COMMENTS however that an additional bullet point consideration should be added to the existing text, to state “… the use of and for this purpose would not be compatible with existing heritage or environmental designations”. This is important to ensure no existing built or natural heritage is negatively impacted as a result