Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan

Object

Representation ID: 8645

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

it should be agreed that a commuted sum in lieu of onsite provision should be made, how will the Council ensure that this sum is then spent on providing the requisite affordable homes?

Confusion remains under the heading 'Why is this policy needed'

Object

Representation ID: 8646

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

see comment above at Policy H1 regarding the inconsistency with the Uppingham Neighbourhood Plan.

Object

Representation ID: 8647

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

A comprehensive definition of what is meant by “sustainable” in this context is required to clarify a clear boundary line between what development will be considered sustainable and what development will be considered unsustainable

Object

Representation ID: 8648

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This policy is incapable of implementation because of its subjectivity and vagueness

Object

Representation ID: 8649

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

As currently worded, the policy would appear to provide a
presumption in favour of development on sites which should be protected; it contains a number of ill-defined
conditions relating to when development would be allowed

Object

Representation ID: 8650

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

It is not clear how the Local Nature Recovery Strategy (LNRS) can inform the preparation of this Local Plan

Object

Representation ID: 8651

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

To comply with subparagraph (d) of the policy will require the LNRS to be specified, but it has yet to be published

Object

Representation ID: 8652

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This policy is about protecting ancient woodland and
veteran trees but is worded as if proposals for development will be accepted provided their loss or destruction can be
avoided.

Object

Representation ID: 8653

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This policy clearly states that BMV land (grades 1 & 2) will not be allowed to be used for renewable energy

The policy is also inconsistent with Policy CC8

Object

Representation ID: 8654

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This policy provides a presumption in favour of development subject to the development not having an adverse impact upon a number of subjective and vaguely defined principles.