Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Support

Representation ID: 7582

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

Criteria d is welcomed

Support noted.

Object

Representation ID: 7583

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

The buffer has already been agreed through assessment
and substantial work on the SPD and permission
2022/0227/MAO in order to protect heritage assets and
their settings, in particular the scheduled monument
1005067 Roman Town at Great Casterton. This should
be shown on the allocations map at this stage.

Reference to heritage assets should be made within the
‘why is this policy needed’ paragraph. Please also refer to
the work previously done on the draft SPD and
2022/0227/MAO for this site which included much greater
detail which could be of assistance for this paragraph.

The policy should be reworded to reflect the agreed buffer to be shown on the revised allocation map.

All site appraisals have been reviewed in the light of comments and further evidence received to determine their suitability for allocation.

Support

Representation ID: 7584

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

Reference to the Shop Front Design Guide within criteria
e) is welcomed.

Support noted.

Support

Representation ID: 7585

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

Criteria c) is welcomed.

Support noted

Support

Representation ID: 7586

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

Criteria a), b), c) and h) are welcomed.

Support noted

Support

Representation ID: 7587

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

The policy is welcomed.

Support Noted.

Object

Representation ID: 7588

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

The policy is welcomed. It would be helpful to reference
setting, particularly to the end of criteria d). It would also
be helpful to include reference to heritage assets and
their settings within the supporting text.

The wording “and their settings” be added to the end
of criteria d)

Noted.

Object

Representation ID: 7589

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

This policy also provides the opportunity to reference the
rich heritage of Rutland Water Area and its numerous
heritage assets and their settings.

Historic England would be very happy to assist with wording.

The rich heritage of the Rutland Water Area (RWA) has been taken into consideration in identifying the boundary of this valued landscape. Policy EN10 is considered appropriate in strictly controlling development within the RWA to protect all of its valued characteristics, special qualities and features.

Object

Representation ID: 7590

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

This policy is welcomed.
Reference to ‘historic assets’ should be updated to
‘heritage assets’ to reflect NPPF terminology.

Within the supporting text, it would be helpful to refer to
non-designated ‘features’ as ‘assets’ to reflect NPPF
terminology. It would also be helpful to include reference
that some non-designated heritage assets are equivalent
to designated heritage assets and that in some cases
local authorities may also identify non-designated
heritage assets as part of the decision making process on
planning applications.

First and third paragraph –
change ‘historic assets’ to ‘heritage assets’ Why this policy is needed, paragraph two – update reference to non-designated ‘features’ to ‘assets’.

General support of the policy noted.

Within the introduction to the policy, it states that there is no need to repeat national policy within Rutland. Para 209 of the NPPF states that the significant of a non-designated heritage asset should be taken into account in determining the application.

Support

Representation ID: 7591

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

This policy is strongly welcomed together with its supporting text.

Support Noted.