Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Object

Representation ID: 5606

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (Cecil Estate Family Trust)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Whilst we support the inclusion of the employment sites identified we object to the policy by way of its omission of Tinwell Business Park, Steadfold Lane a n existing 1.26 ha employment site providing a range of light industrial, storage and office sapce.

Object

Representation ID: 5611

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (Cecil Estate Family Trust)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

We object to no allocation of housing within the Larger Village of Great Casterton despite its sustainable location served by good public transport links, a primary and secondary school, vetinery surgery and other services. We would advocate extensions to PLD on the western edge of the village to allow for a well balanced spacial strategy of housing development across a range of Larger Villages over the Plan Period.

Support

Representation ID: 5616

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (Cecil Estate Family Trust)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

We are supportive of the presumption in favour of solar and renewable energy developments. However the policy needs to be reflective of the impact electricity grid connection capacity constraints (a necessary upgrade works) have on the size and location of areas identified for solar development. The policy must not eliminate development in other areas which may be suitable and satisfy the key policy tests. For areas identified as ground mounted solar potential there should be flexibility in the size of the areas provided they satisfy other policies of the plan.