Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Support

Representation ID: 5586

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (on behalf of Exton Estate)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

RCC should allocate the most suitable of the reserve sites within the larger settlements that have been identified in the LPPO, including Land North of Mill Lane, Cottesmore (Reserve Site H1.a), which is a suitable development site in the most sustainable larger village settlement, as reflected in RCC’s proposal to reserve the site for future development.

Support

Representation ID: 5590

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (on behalf of Exton Estate)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

We support the inclusion of industrial and brownfield land including disused railheads within the spatial strategy of waste management.

Object

Representation ID: 5591

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (on behalf of Exton Estate)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Alternative sites for waste management inert waste and recycling should be included within the policy to ensure a robust and flexible planning policy. To this end we would advocate the inclusion of land south of Cottesmore known as Cottesmore Sidings is within the policy wording.

Support

Representation ID: 5593

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (on behalf of Exton Estate)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

As a defined Larger Village we support this scale of development within PLD of Exton.

Support

Representation ID: 5595

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (on behalf of Exton Estate)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

As a defined Larger Village we support then principle of development in the order of this scale within PLD of Exton.

Support

Representation ID: 5598

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (on behalf of Exton Estate)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Whilst we support the allocation of this site as a reserve for housing, to ensure a better spatial strategy of housing development within the Larger Villages we would advocate inclusion of this land within the sites proposed for residential development.

Support

Representation ID: 5617

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (on behalf of Exton Estate)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

We are supportive of the presumption in favour of solar and renewable energy developments. However the policy needs to be reflective of the impact electricity grid connection capacity constraints (a necessary upgrade works) have on the size and location of areas identified for solar development. The policy must not eliminate development in other areas which may be suitable and satisfy the key policy tests. For areas identified as ground mounted solar potential there should be flexibility in the size of the areas provided they satisfy the criteria of other policies of the plan.