Regulation 18 draft Local Plan
Search representations
Results for Stamford Town Council search
New searchObject
Regulation 18 draft Local Plan
(Quarry Farm/Monarch Park)
Representation ID: 4799
Received: 19/12/2023
Respondent: Stamford Town Council
Policy H1: sites proposed for residential development - almost 50% of RCC's allocated housing is at Quarry Farm, taking Stamford amenities and affecting transport, environment etc.
Object
Regulation 18 draft Local Plan
(Quarry Farm/Monarch Park)
Representation ID: 4800
Received: 19/12/2023
Respondent: Stamford Town Council
It is a Local Candidate Wildlife site and it’s inclusion is in conflict with Rutland’s environmental strategy, especially its Nature Recovery Strategy (EN2), Biodiversity Action Plan and previous CS4 policy commitment to not build in open countryside. Neither does it fulfil the criteria for a sustainable community, partly because of the spatial strategy, but also because of its over-reliance on service and infrastructure provision in the neighbouring town of Stamford (within SKDC).
Object
Regulation 18 draft Local Plan
Policy H2 – Cross-boundary development opportunity – Stamford North
Representation ID: 4801
Received: 19/12/2023
Respondent: Stamford Town Council
The proposed development is set in open countryside and next to a SSSI on the Great North Road and there are more appropriate sites for a development of this size in Rutland - e.g. St Georges Barracks. The development will put upon Stamford unacceptable levels of traffic and the town will not have sufficient infrastructure (healthcare, schooling, to cope with this proposal, if taken in conjunction with the Stamford North Development on 1350 houses.
Support
Regulation 18 draft Local Plan
Policy SS5 – St. George's Barracks Opportunity Area
Representation ID: 4802
Received: 19/12/2023
Respondent: Stamford Town Council
This is the perfect site for a future development so should be included as a full allocation in the Local Plan. A Memorandum of Understanding has been created already between RCC and the MOD for the use of this site, post-closure, for residential development and was proposed for the Local Plan that was rejected recently. With a potential 2200 homes, based on the evolving Masterplan, which would still leave an area of 160 hectares after residential development for other uses.