Object

Representation ID: 8158

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Ian Briggs

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Point B - Bullet 2 is not in accordance with the thrust and approach of national policy in NPPF 2023 concerning minerals development.

The wording can easily be misconstrued as requiring some other recompense beyond environmental mitigation measures. Bullet 2 gives an undefined requirement to compensate local communities with no indication of what the compensation is for, why it is justified, how it should be calculated or how it might impact on planning decisions. In effect, it will create an objectors' charter.

Object

Representation ID: 8227

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Matthew Eatough

Agent: DLP Planning Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Policy MIN10 is not sound as it is not effective. The policy relates only to the implementation of minerals and waste development and should also include restoration and aftercare.

Please refer to paragraphs 2.24 - 2.27 of the Regulation 19 (Pre-Submission) Rutland Local Plan Consultation Response document (dated 29th November 2024, prepared by DLP Planning Ltd).

Support

Representation ID: 8679

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Anglian Water

Note the waste site monitoring proposed by RCC in part d) of Policy MIN10. AWS recommends that monitoring by waste planning authority’s such as RCC is undertaken in liaison with the EA.