Object

Representation ID: 8170

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Stoke Dry Estate

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The policy includes blanket resistance to all self catered holiday accommodation within the Eyebrook Reservoir Area. It is considered that certain small scale, low key, forms of accommodation, for example ‘tree houses’ and / or walkers bothy style accommodation, if well located and not visible from the shoreline should be supported within the Eyebrook area to service existing visitors and uses.

Object

Representation ID: 8210

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: R S Hurwood

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

I remember when Empingham Reservoir was being proposed in the 1970s that the county was assured it would never become a tourist attraction

Object

Representation ID: 8393

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Hanbury Farms Partnership

Agent: Savills

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Support the overall policy but suggest an AMENDMENT as follows:

Therefore, we suggest the following addition to Policy E9:

“Where planning permission is sought for the conversion of residential development to holiday accommodation, there will be a presumption in favour of the change of use, subject to potential impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties.”

Object

Representation ID: 8630

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Anglian Water

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Do not believe that Rutland Water should be carved out of the policy as Rutland Water is an existing visitor and recreation centre and so a sustainable location in transport terms for additional accommodation.