Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan

Representation ID: 8250

Received: 30/11/2024

Respondent: Hereward Homes Greetham Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The NPPF does not make the distinction between office and other types of employment when it is addressing the need to support the rural economy – there is no justification for such a distinction to be made in this policy.

Object

Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan

Representation ID: 8581

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Best Little Building Co. Ltd

Agent: Invicta Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy E2 supports new employment development proposals within the Planned Limits of Development in towns and larger villages, but does not allow flexibility for sites outside these limits. Amending Policy E2 would allow new employment development on land adjacent to the limits, creating an opportunity to deliver additional employment land in sustainable locations, ensuring consistency within the Local Plan and NPPF.

Object

Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan

Representation ID: 8625

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Anglian Water

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Have an informative advising that applicants should contact AWS at an early stage in site selection to consider water demands and process efficiencies