Object
Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan
Representation ID: 8062
Received: 31/10/2024
Respondent: ANCER SPA Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Uppingham Gate site should not be shown in the policy and the Proposals Map as allocated for solely employment purposes. The Uppingham Neighbourhood Plan Review, which has been the subject of Independent Examination and has strong community support, allocates the site for mixed-use development including not only B2 and B8 small industrial units , but also E1 uses including a convenience retail store, C2 uses for elderly persons housing and C3 market and affordable housing.
Object
Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan
Representation ID: 8092
Received: 26/11/2024
Respondent: NFU
Agent: CT Planning
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Objection is made to the proposed extension to the Uppingham Gate allocation Policy E1.2 to extend over land in the ownership of NFU.
There is no realistic prospect of Uppingham Gate coming forward having been allocated for some 20 years. There is no evidence to suggest that its prospects are enhanced by increasing the proposed allocation. The NFU has never promoted the land for employment use and there is no willingness to bring forward this additional land for employment uses.
Object
Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan
Representation ID: 8423
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Maureen Thomas
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The choice of function of uses of buildings at Uppingham Gate must be carefully reviewed by planning and highways departments to ensure access issues connecting to the A47 and nearby roads to housing estates can cope.
Object
Regulation 19 Rutland Local Plan
Representation ID: 8486
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: McCarthy Stone
Agent: The Planning Bureau Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Rutland regulation 19 Local Plan consultation draft is clearly at odds with the submission draft Neighbourhood Plan that is at an advanced stage in production as well as being inconsistent with itself that states that allocations at Uppingham will be delivered by the Neighbourhood Plan. Employment allocation E1.2 should therefore be deleted and Map 41 amended accordingly. As currently drafted The Rutland Local Plan regulation 19 consultation is inconsistent with the Neighbourhood Plan and national policy and in particular NPPF paragraphs 16 and 126.