Support

Representation ID: 8108

Received: 27/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Rob Cooke

The limestone geology is also important for its palaeontology.

Support

Representation ID: 8145

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Ian Briggs

Heidelberg Materials supports the references to geology, minerals, cement manufacture and Heidelberg Materials’ importance in Rutland.


Justified: -
The text is justified given the evidence regarding geology in the County and the operations taking place at Ketton and the recognition of their regional and national importance in Section 17 of the NPPF/NPPG

Support

Representation ID: 8369

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: South Kesteven District Council

South Kesteven District Council welcomes the Spatial Portrait’s reference to Stamford and its provision of a range of community and leisure facilities including shopping, education and health services. As well as the surrounding villages within South Kesteven, the Spatial Portrait rightly acknowledges that Stamford acts as a service centre to villages on the eastern side of Rutland.

Object

Representation ID: 8505

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Annabel Sharpe

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Also we believe that Lyddington as with other similar Rutland villages needs to be preserved for future generations . If we need more houses then create new villages .

Object

Representation ID: 8541

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: De Merke Estates

Agent: Stantec

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

In the light of the presently submitted (and available) information, we question whether RCC has
adequately addressed its statutory obligations in respect of “duty to cooperate”. This goes to the heart
of the “soundness” of the Local Plan – and is our first major objection.

Support

Representation ID: 8598

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Anglian Water

Welcome the changes to the description of Stamford in the Regulation 19 draft. The change enables a positive and evidenced based approach to be taken such that if growth elsewhere in Rutland was found to be less sustainable due to a lack of viable public transport, for example,
then growth in the form of a sustainable urban extension, with its attendant infrastructure and service cost and carbon economies of scale may be the most sustainable long-term option delivering more of the Council’s vision for Rutland.

Object

Representation ID: 8637

Received: 01/12/2024

Respondent: CPRE Rutland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Economy, Page 9 – The text refers to Table 1 but the relevant data are in Table 2 which follows

The plan recognises that Rutland must co-operate with neighbouring authorities in
several ways, but there is no mention of those other authorities co-operating with Rutland.