Map comments

Object

Representation ID: 7121

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Mr Neil Tunstall

The interactive maps on the website do not work, meaning residents are not able to see where controversial developers may have requested to add a site to the local plan.

Object

Representation ID: 7417

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Linda Gray

There is particular concern about the area on the Policy Map, to the East of Barnsdale Avenue, which is designated as an opportunity area for solar and wind. This site is immediately North of the Rutland Water Policy Area and very close to Rutland Water and 900 m. from its Nature Reserve. Thermal Runaway in a battery storage unit would pose a serious threat to the public water supply and a wind or solar installation would threaten protected wildfowl approaching the lagoons of the Nature Reserve.

It is a major concern that the policy for renewables is not sufficiently prescriptive and could well lead to the uncoordinated introduction of solar and wind installations, threatening the outstanding beauty of the County and its substantial revenue from tourism.

Object

Representation ID: 7754

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Anglian Water

On the Policies map we would welcome confirmation that the Plan is not seeking to expand the Rutland Water Area to include Oakham WRC? With reference to the P-TAL issue explained above and work to support growth in the Oakham catchment further investment will be required in AMP8 (in addition to works being undertaken this AMP – 2020-2025). This is likely to entail a need to further expand the WRC. It would be a significant concern if the Rutland Water Area policy washed over the WRC area and then presented a policy bar on expansion to support growth and improved environmental performance.