Support

Representation ID: 7286

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Manor Oak Homes

Agent: Mr Andy Moffat

Ryhall’s inclusion as a Larger Village is supported. The inclusion of “Proposals for housing development on greenfield sites adjoining the Planned Limits of Development of Oakham and Barleythorpe, Uppingham and the Larger Villages will only be released in exceptional circumstances where it is demonstrated that they are needed to maintain a sufficient supply of 4 deliverable and developable land. This will normally be undertaken through a review of the Local Plan” is welcomed.

Support noted

Object

Representation ID: 7894

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Ryhall Parish Council

SS1 Spatial Strategy for New Development. Ryhall’s comments with regard to proposed PLD

a) RHY1 - To be on Property Boundary
b) RYH2 - Please confirm why this small parcel has been placed within the PLD?
c) RYH3 - Request to be inside the PLD
d) RYH4 - Request to be inside the PLD
e) RYH5 - Request to be outside the PLD
f) RYH6 - Request to be outside the PLD
g) RYH7 - Includes row of Garages? Are these freehold to the local Properties? Land “split” into two areas, garages and spiny to be outside PLD
h) RYH8 - Request to be inside the PLD
i) Also Request Trout Hatchery & Land between Gwash Close and Gwash Meadows to be inside the PLD (see attached)

We offer a general comment on PLD issues … that is not having a PLD for Smaller Villages may have the unintended consequence of encouraging individual development of large ‘prestige’ detached properties which can change the identity of that community. We recommend all smaller villages should have a defined Planned Limit of Development.

a) Ryh1 shown on the map within the supporting evidence document (PLD Review Study 2023) includes the rear (northern) gardens considered on balance to be within the curtilage of properties to the north of the A6121. This provides consistency with the approach taken in all settlements with a PLD, in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.
b) Ryh2 is considered to be garden land within the curtilage of the property Old Quarry Lodge, and thus included within the PLD in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.
c) Ryh3: housing at St. Eabba’s Close is included within the PLD.
d) Ryh4: the property at the corner of Essendine Road (A6121) and Crown Street / Back Lane is included within the PLD.
e) Agree to change: Ryh5 is incorrectly drawn, as only a very small part of this area should be included within the PLD as garden curtilage to one property on Foundary Road.
f) Ryh6 is Ryhall Cemetery, removed from the previous PLD around Ryhall as located outside the main built framework of the village. This provides consistency with the approach taken in all settlements with a PLD, in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.
g) Ryh7: the row of garages and established tree belt on the eastern side of the A6121 have been removed from the previous PLD around Ryhall as located outside the main built framework of the village. This provides consistency with the approach taken in all settlements with a PLD, in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023. Protection to the tree belt is proposed as an Important Frontage under policy EN8.
h) Ryh8 includes the rear (northern) garden land considered to be within the curtilage of No. 15 Lea View, and thus included within the PLD in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.
i) Criteria for adjustment to the PLD include accommodation of allocated residential sites under the draft plan. The site referred to as land between Gwash Close and Gwash Meadows is identified as H1.7 Land South West of Belmesthorpe Lane, Ryhall, and therefore the PLD revised to accommodate this.
Land at the trout hatchery is also included within the PLD.