Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Support

Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 4512

Received: 14/11/2023

Respondent: Casterton College Rutland

Representation Summary:

The village is served by a good school that is on the school rebuilding programme so this is an idea opportunity to expand in a sustainable manner.


Our response:

Support Noted.

Support

Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 5541

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Mark Bush

Representation Summary:

I support the amended planned limits of development for Great Casterton in particular the one which will allow further development of Casterton College


Our response:

The Planned Limits of Development (PLD) for Great Casterton include land considered on balance to be within the curtilage of residential buildings and The Crown Inn, and include the playing fields of Casterton College. This provides consistency with the approach taken in all settlements with a PLD, in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.

There is no presumption in favour of development for land falling within the PLD. All planning applications for proposed development will be considered against all relevant policies within the Development Plan and any material considerations

Object

Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 5552

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Mrs Wendy Shelbourn

Representation Summary:

If the PLD line is to be moved, it should run along the end of all the gardens in a natural line.
As it is it goes along this line until 44 when it comes down our boundary with 44A and cuts through our garden to the Pickworth road
and leaves our out-buildings and road access outside of the new boundary line.
Surley the PLD line should be at the end of our garden as with all the other properties.


Our response:

Land at the rear of No. 44 Pickworth Lane comprises out-buildings and a separate access on to the lane, and on balance is considered to be outside the main residential curtilage of No. 44 and thus beyond the Planned Limits to Development.

Object

Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 5611

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Strutt & Parker (Cecil Estate Family Trust)

Agent: Strutt & Parker

Representation Summary:

We object to no allocation of housing within the Larger Village of Great Casterton despite its sustainable location served by good public transport links, a primary and secondary school, vetinery surgery and other services. We would advocate extensions to PLD on the western edge of the village to allow for a well balanced spacial strategy of housing development across a range of Larger Villages over the Plan Period.


Our response:

Comments noted. All sites received through the Call for Sites process have gone through a detailed site assessment process to ensure the most sustainable sites are included as allocations. Any changes in addition to those highlighted in the PLD review 2023 are not deemed necessary.

Object

Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 5946

Received: 07/01/2024

Respondent: Mrs Wendy Shelbourn

Representation Summary:

GtC3
Although I have no objection to the re-development by the Academy as an educational centre alone I do however, object to RCC promoting the idea that this sports/playing field in open countryside should be given over to a housing development which would be of absolutely no benefit to the residents of Great Casterton.
Surely the same criteria as the recently refused 2022/1476/FUL must also apply to this site.


Our response:

The Planned Limits of Development (PLD) for Great Casterton include land considered on balance to be within the curtilage of residential buildings and The Crown Inn, and include the playing fields of Casterton College. This provides consistency with the approach taken in all settlements with a PLD, in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.

There is no presumption in favour of development for land falling within the PLD. All planning applications for proposed development will be considered against all relevant policies within the Development Plan and any material considerations.

Object

Regulation 18 draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 6234

Received: 07/01/2024

Respondent: Great Casterton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Proposed PLD amendment GtC3 & 4; GCPC objects to the use of this land for housing development and refers RCC to many of the arguments raised in objection to the proposed development by Stancliffe homes at College Close. GCPC is fully supportive of the development of educational facilities on this land and welcomes the anticipated funding that will be forthcoming as part of the college's inclusion within the Governments School Rebuilding Programme. Also the area GtC2 label is missing from the Proposed PLD amendments map


Our response:

The Planned Limits of Development (PLD) for Great Casterton include land considered on balance to be within the curtilage of residential buildings and The Crown Inn, and include the playing fields of Casterton College. This provides consistency with the approach taken in all settlements with a PLD, in accordance with the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.

There is no presumption in favour of development for land falling within the PLD. All planning applications for proposed development will be considered against all relevant policies within the Development Plan and any material considerations