Support

Representation ID: 5280

Received: 03/01/2024

Respondent: Tracey Chadwick

I agree that all development within Cottesmore should be within the PLD. The proposed site of Land of Mill Lane is located outside of this and therefore should not be considered for future development. The proposed site is also contrary to the Neighbourhood plan policy COT H8 as “All future development should be in general small-scale with no individual housing proposal exceeding 20 dwellings; and making use of previously developed land”. This is a “greenfield site” and the proposal is far greater than the 20 dwelling limit set out in the Neighbourhood plan.

Comments noted. The revised PLD for Cottesmore has been drawn utilising the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.

This excludes any proposed reserve site residential allocations. The subsequent grant of planning permission or allocation as a full residential site under H1 would result in a future PLD adjustment in accordance with the PLD study methodology. Identification of reserve site allocations beyond the PLD does not undermine its purposes or future development when trigger criteria for development arise.

Support

Representation ID: 5599

Received: 05/01/2024

Respondent: Zoe BELFORD

Agree with statement

Support noted

Support

Representation ID: 5991

Received: 07/01/2024

Respondent: Mr Stuart Chadwick

All development should be contained with the PLD to help avoid communities spreading out into open countryside. The reserve site of Land off Mill Lane is not within the PLD, so therefore should not be considered for development. More appropriate in full sites should be used for development within the village such as Harrier Close.

Comments noted. The revised PLD for Cottesmore has been drawn utilising the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.

This excludes any proposed reserve site residential allocations. The subsequent grant of planning permission or allocation as a full residential site under H1 would result in a future PLD adjustment in accordance with the PLD study methodology. Identification of reserve site allocations beyond the PLD does not undermine its purposes or future development when trigger criteria for development arise.

Object

Representation ID: 7412

Received: 08/01/2024

Respondent: Hereward Homes

Agent: Barmach Ltd

If PLD’s are retained it is recommended that boundaries be extended as set out below to reflect the physical
form of Cottesmore village to allow small scale sustainable development - See attached map

Part eastern area identified on respondents Map 3 (incorrectly titled as Empingham) to be included in PLD as established curtilage.

Include only the eastern section as defined by single boundary line and including outbuilding. Area to west of this shall remain excluded from the PLD under the criteria of the methodology established by the PLD Review Study 2023.

Object

Representation ID: 7433

Received: 07/01/2024

Respondent: Cottesmore Parish Council

We note the changes to the Spatial Strategy, particularly the ‘simplification’ of the hierarchy of the villages and hamlets into just two groupings and the changes to the Planned Limits of Development. Cottesmore, as we would expect, is classed as a larger village in which it would be expected to have some development during the Plan period and that services would be located here, we have no issue with this in principle. Our primary concerns have been and continue to relate to the location, scale and type of development proposed.

Support noted