Object

Representation ID: 8213

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: R S Hurwood

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Again why does CC8 trump this? It’s all the same landscape!

Object

Representation ID: 8448

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: House Builders Federation

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This policy states that all development proposals will be assessed in relation to Conservation Area Appraisals, adopted Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) and adopted site-specific design guides and design codes.

This policy seems to be seeking to give Local Plan status to an existing SPDs which is not appropriate.

Object

Representation ID: 8533

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: The Society of Merchant Venturers

Agent: Savills

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

In a similar context to Policy SC1, the draft wording for Policy SC2 confirms that local character and distinctiveness should have regard to the Rutland Landscape Character Assessment 2022 and the RSLSS 2023.

Object

Representation ID: 8550

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: De Merke Estates

Agent: Stantec

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The draft landscape policies (Policies SC1, SC2 and SC3) are all predicated and reliant upon the findings
of the “Rutland Landscape Character Assessment 2022” and the “Settlement Landscape Sensitivity
Assessment 2023”.
We do not concur with the findings of these landscape studies