Object

Representation ID: 8115

Received: 27/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Rob Cooke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

There is considerable light pollution arising from existing developments at Wireless Hill; this should be addressed.

Object

Representation ID: 8199

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: CS Ellis (Group) Ltd.

Agent: Mr George Weightman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Support - comments provided on wording.

Object

Representation ID: 8399

Received: 02/12/2024

Respondent: Network Rail

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Policy E1.6 - Wireless Hill, South Luffenham - we note that the policy wording includes provision of a full transport assessment which we support. It should be noted that the transport assessment must include consideration of the impact of the scheme upon operational railway safety. In particular, we note that the site is south of the level crossing at Luffenham and the impacts of traffic type and volume associated with the development upon the safety of the railway crossing must be considered by the assessment and mitigation provided where appropriate.